A general framework for distance-based consensus in ordinal ranking models

The problem of aggregating a set of ordinal rankings of n alternatives has given rise to a number of consensus models. Among the most common of these models are those due to Borda and Kendall, which amount to using average ranks, and the /1 and /2 distance models. A common criticism of these approaches is their use of ordinal rank position numbers directly as the values of being ranked at those levels. This paper presents a general framework for associating value or worth with ordinal ranks, and develops models for deriving a consensus based on this framework. It is shown that the /Z distance models using this framework are equivalent to the conventional ordinal models for any p > 1. This observation can be seen as a form of validation of the practice of using ordinal data in a manner for which it was presumably not designed. In particular, it establishes the robustness of the simple Borda, Kendall and median ranking models.